The audit report.
The assessment itself. Each surface reviewed against usability heuristics, with the specific defect, the principle it breaks, and how severe it is. Written to be read by a designer or an engineer, not skimmed by a committee.
Send us what you have built. You get back a written heuristic audit and a prioritized list of usability issues, in two to three business days, at no cost.
Teams rarely lack ideas about what is wrong with their product. They lack an ordered list. Support tickets say one thing, the last stakeholder meeting said another, and nobody can say which fix moves a number.
A heuristic evaluation settles that. It measures the interface against established usability principles rather than against taste, so the output is a list of specific defects with a severity attached. You can argue with a preference. It is much harder to argue with a broken error state.
This audit is free and it is not a sales call in disguise. You get the document whether or not you ever hire us.
Step 01
Fill in the form on this page with a link to the product, a prototype, or a design file. Sketches and wireframes are enough.
Step 02
You get an email confirming what we will review and a link to book a short call. If we cannot audit what you sent, we say so here rather than after you have waited.
Step 03
A short conversation about who the product is for and what you need it to do. Usability is relative to a task, so a review without the task is guesswork.
Step 04
The product is assessed against usability heuristics, surface by surface, including the empty, loading, and error states that reviews usually skip.
Step 05
A written audit report and an insights document, listing pain points and usability issues in priority order.
The assessment itself. Each surface reviewed against usability heuristics, with the specific defect, the principle it breaks, and how severe it is. Written to be read by a designer or an engineer, not skimmed by a committee.
The shorter document, and usually the more useful one. Pain points and usability issues in priority order, framed as decisions you can act on this quarter rather than as a redesign you cannot fund.
Both documents are yours. Nothing in them is held back pending an engagement, and there is no version of this that arrives as a slide deck read out on a call.
If you only have an idea, there is nothing to evaluate. A heuristic review needs an interface, and running one against a concept produces confident nonsense.
Sketches count. Wireframes count. A live product obviously counts. A description of an app you intend to build does not.
If that is where you are, the useful conversation is about scope and cost, not usability. Start there instead.
One form, then a confirmation email. We need a link we can actually open.
Design work from these Pods has won Indigo Design Awards for Luna, Nab, Fashioned Health and FlightLogger, including Gold for UX, Interface and Navigation. Koombea has been shipping software since 2007.
How design runs inside a Pod
Esta misma auditoría, en español
If you are earlier than an interface
The products these reviews came out of